The Difference Between Urgency and Importance
Low sun glowing through mist above a calm lake, casting a golden reflection across the water. Photograph by Charissa Simmons
In leadership, urgency often gets mistaken for importance.
Fast-moving issues, loud problems, and emotionally charged situations tend to demand immediate attention. They create pressure to respond, decide, or intervene quickly. Over time, leaders can find themselves operating almost entirely in reaction mode, moving from one urgent issue to the next.
But urgency and importance are not the same thing.
Urgency is emotional. It’s driven by time pressure, visibility, and discomfort. Importance is directional. It’s tied to long-term outcomes, values, and the system’s health over time.
The challenge is that urgency is loud, while importance is often quiet.
Important work rarely announces itself with alarms. It shows up as foundational decisions, consistent standards, and steady leadership behaviors that don’t feel dramatic in the moment but compound over time. Because it doesn’t create immediate relief, it’s easy to defer, especially when urgent issues keep pulling attention elsewhere.
When leaders prioritize urgency over importance for too long, several things happen. Strategic work stalls. Standards become inconsistent. People begin to orient around what feels loud rather than what actually matters. The organization stays busy, but sustaining progress becomes harder.
This is where discernment becomes a core leadership skill.
Effective leaders learn to pause long enough to ask a different set of questions:
Does this require immediate action, or does it require a thoughtful response?
Is this loud because it’s critical, or loud because it’s uncomfortable?
What decision here will still matter six months or later?
That pause isn’t avoidance. It’s a judgment.
Leading by importance doesn’t mean ignoring urgency. It means not allowing urgency to dictate direction. Leaders still respond, but they do so from a place of clarity rather than pressure. Over time, this shifts the organization’s rhythm. Fewer fires feel existential. Fewer decisions feel rushed. More energy is directed toward work that actually moves things forward.
This distinction becomes even more critical during periods of change. Uncertainty tends to amplify urgency. Everything can feel immediate. Without intentional prioritization, leaders risk exhausting themselves and their teams on issues that feel pressing but don’t meaningfully shape the future.
Choosing importance over urgency is rarely the most straightforward path in the moment. It requires tolerance for discomfort, confidence in judgment, and trust that steady leadership will outlast reactive speed.
But leaders who consistently make that distinction create organizations that are not just responsive, they are resilient.
Urgency demands attention.
Importance deserves leadership.
If this resonated, you may want to read this next → Energy Triage: Why Pulling Back Can Be a Leadership Skill